We experienced zero wobbles in wide carves, on quick turns, or through ice chunks. The asymmetric design - meaning, there’s a deeper heelside sidecut - helped balance transitions. The board’s edges are wavy instead of straight, increasing hold, especially on tough surfaces. The twin-shaped design features a trademarked technology called Magne-Traction. This board handles wild variability like a pro. The GNU Ladies Choice ($630) holds a sturdy edge and cuts chatter down boilerplate moguls and hard-as-nails groomers, yet rips deep powder in the steeps. The Best Women’s All-Mountain Snowboards of 2023
Yes typo 163w free#
Also, make sure to check out our comparison chart to help steer your decision-making.įeel free to scroll through and check all of our recommended buys, or jump to the category you’re looking for:īest Women's Powder-Leaning All-Mountain Snowboard:īest Women's Freestyle-Leaning All-Mountain Snowboard:īest Men's Powder-Leaning All-Mountain Snowboard:īest Men's Freestyle-Leaning All-Mountain Snowboard: If you’d like to learn more about all-mountain snowboards and their features, jump down to our buyer’s guide and FAQ at the bottom of this article. No matter your budget or riding preferences, we’re confident this list includes the perfect all-mountain snowboard for you. Our extensive list includes powder-leaning models, park-friendly prize winners, and everything in between. To compile this list, we sifted through the crowded field and selected only the very best all-mountain snowboards of 2023. There are lots of excellent snowboards on the market, and innovative models are introduced with each upcoming season.
Though the definition of “all-mountain” varies by retailer and brand, all of the snowboards on this list perform well across a broad range of riding styles and snow conditions. From aggressive carving over groomers to carefree floating through powder, the boards featured on this list offer true quiver-of-one versatility.
All-mountain snowboards are like hot sauce - they’re good on just about anything.
0 kommentar(er)
